Abstract
Effects of alkalosis (pH 7.4) or acidosis (pH 6.8) on the intrinsic mechanical properties of control and pressure-overloaded rat hearts were studied in Triton X-100-treated left ventricular fiber bundles. In control bundles, Ca sensitivity [pCa required for one-half maximal response (pCa50)] was 5.520 +/- 0.012 at pH 7.1. Alkalosis increased it by 0.357 +/- 0.018 pCa unit, whereas acidosis decreased it by 0.365 +/- 0.014 pCa unit with no change in Hill coefficient. Maximal tension was decreased by acidic pH and increased by alkaline pH. Stiffness was measured by the response to quick length changes. Acidosis decreased maximal stiffness but increased the stiffness-to-force ratio, whereas alkalosis increased maximal stiffness but had no effect on stiffness-to-force ratio, suggesting that acidosis decreased the force generated per cross bridge. Alkalosis increased the time constant of tension recovery following a quick stretch from 10.6 +/- 0.66 to 17.45 +/- 1.83 ms, suggesting a decreased cross-bridge cycling rate. Pressure overload induced by thoracic aortic stenosis for 4-6 wk led to a 200% cardiac hypertrophy associated with a shift from fast to slow ventricular myosin. pCa50 of hypertrophied bundles was not different from control (5.541 +/- 0.012). Ca sensitivity was increased by 0.383 +/- 0.008 in alkaline medium and decreased by 0.325 +/- 0.009 in acidic medium. Stiffness-to-force ratio was decreased in acidic pH, and the time constant of tension recovery was increased from 31.0 +/- 0.4 to 34.9 +/- 0.25 ms by alkalosis. In hypertrophied bundles, maximal tension was decreased by acidic pH but not changed by alkalosis. These results show that in the small pH range of our study 1) pH changes have symmetrical effects on Ca sensitivity in both control and hypertrophied bundles, 2) a decrease or an increase in H+ concentration does not have symmetrical effects on the mechanics of the cross bridges, and 3) changes in the phenotype of contractile proteins induced by aortic stenosis do not influence Ca sensitivity, only moderately influence the response to pH changes, and mainly affect the cross-bridge cycling rate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.