Abstract
BackgroundThe chronic care model was proven effective in improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in developed countries. However, evidence in developing countries is scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER-PAR intervention (based on the chronic care model) in improving clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus using readily available resources in the Malaysian public primary care setting.MethodsThis was a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, parallel, matched pair, controlled trial using participatory action research approach, conducted in 10 public primary care clinics in Malaysia. Five clinics were randomly selected to provide the EMPOWER-PAR intervention for 1 year and another five clinics continued with usual care. Patients who fulfilled the criteria were recruited over a 2-week period by each clinic. The obligatory intervention components were designed based on four elements of the chronic care model i.e. healthcare organisation, delivery system design, self-management support and decision support. The primary outcome was the change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 6.5%. Secondary outcomes were the change in proportion of patients achieving targets for blood pressure, lipid profile, body mass index and waist circumference. Intention to treat analysis was performed for all outcome measures. A generalised estimating equation method was used to account for baseline differences and clustering effect.ResultsA total of 888 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were recruited at baseline (intervention: 471 vs. control: 417). At 1-year, 96.6 and 97.8% of patients in the intervention and control groups completed the study, respectively. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups were comparable. The change in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c target was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (intervention: 3.0% vs. control: −4.1%, P < 0.002). Patients who received the EMPOWER-PAR intervention were twice more likely to achieve HbA1c target compared to those in the control group (adjusted OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34–3.50, P < 0.002). However, there was no significant improvement found in the secondary outcomes.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that the EMPOWER-PAR intervention was effective in improving the primary outcome for type 2 diabetes in the Malaysian public primary care setting.Trial registrationRegistered with: ClinicalTrials.gov.: NCT01545401. Date of registration: 1st March 2012. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0557-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
The chronic care model was proven effective in improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in developed countries
This study demonstrates that the EMPOWER-participatory action research (PAR) intervention was effective in improving the primary outcome for type 2 diabetes in the Malaysian public primary care setting
For diastolic blood pressure (BP), both groups showed an increment at 1-year follow-up, the intervention group had a significantly lower mean change in diastolic BP compared to the control group
Summary
The chronic care model was proven effective in improving clinical outcomes of diabetes in developed countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER-PAR intervention (based on the chronic care model) in improving clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes mellitus using readily available resources in the Malaysian public primary care setting. It is estimated that 415 million people suffer from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with the global prevalence of 8.8% [1]. The number is predicted to increase beyond 642 million people within the 25 years [1] and deaths attributable to T2DM will double by 2030 [2]. It has been projected that Malaysia would have a total of 3.2 million people with T2DM by the year 2030 [1]. T2DM was the 9th leading cause of disease burden in Malaysia as measured by the Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) [4] and the 6th leading cause of premature death as measured by the number of years of life lost (YLLs) [5]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have