Abstract

Objective study This is 1) for know Performance Study student with Which No using a constructivism approach, 2) to determine students' learning achievements using PBL Model learning, 3) to find out what exists difference on performance Study between Which No use approach constructivism by using a constructivist approach to student economics material class I This research is a quantitative research with a post test only control design design. The place used for this research was SMP N 3 Muarasipongi One Roof . The research population was 15 students from class IX, using simple random sampling techniques. Data collection technique with written tests and documentation. Class I X as an experimental class. Technique analysis data Which used For analyze data in This research is an analysis t-test statistical data. Based on test score results. Student showing post-test average score the experimental class was 80.8 and the average post-test score for the control class was 67.6. For experimental class which means good, based on the analysis results it is known that the significance level is 5% for mark 68 (significant level of 5% or 1% for N = 70 and dk = 68, because dk = 68 does not listed in table distribution t so taken mark 60) Mark t table of et al = 60 is 2.02 And 5.756 which means t count > t table, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. So "there is a difference Which significant between approach constructivism And besides use approach constructivism on business economics learning achievement, material on the role of economic actors among students class.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call