Abstract
This review sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the 'Stress Control' (SC) large psychoeducational 6-session group programme developed to increase access to treatment for patients with anxiety and depression. Systematic review and meta-analysis (Prospero registration: CRD42020173676). Pre-post and post-treatment follow-up effect sizes were extracted and synthesized in a random effects meta-analysis, and variations in effect sizes were investigated via moderator analyses. Secondary analyses synthesized between-group effect sizes from controlled studies containing comparator treatments and calculated the average dropout rate. The quality of the meta-analysis was assessed using the GRADE approach. Nineteen studies with pre-post treatment outcomes were included. The average group size was N=39, and the average dropout rate was 34%. Pooled effect sizes indicated moderate pre-post treatment reductions in anxiety (ES=0.58; CI 0.41 to 0.75; N=5597; Z=7.13; p<.001), moderate reductions in depression (ES=0.62; CI 0.44 to 0.80; N=5538, Z=7.30; p<.001), and large reductions in global distress (ES=0.86; CI 0.61 to 1.11; N=591; Z=7.41; p<.001). At follow-up, improvements in anxiety, depression, and global distress were maintained. When SC was compared to active and passive controls, outcomes were equivalent for anxiety (ES=0.12, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.49, Z=-0.70; p=.482) and depression (ES=0.15, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.54, Z=0.84; p=.401). SC appears to be a clinically effective and durable low-intensity group intervention that facilitates access to treatment for large patient numbers. However, conclusions are limited by the low methodological quality of the evidence. The stress control version of large group psychoeducation is appropriate and effective for mild-to-moderate anxiety and depression The evidence base for stress control is predominantly made up of practice-based studies Stress control needs to form one component of the overall offer made to patients presenting with mild-to-moderate anxiety and depression The competencies required to deliver such groups need better specification.
Highlights
This review investigated the effectiveness of Stress Control’ (SC) group-based psychoeducational interventions on anxiety, depression, and global distress
The depression and anxiety effect sizes (ES) were comparable though slightly lower than the pre–post treatment ES reported in a recent meta-analysis of practice-based evidence from the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme (Wakefield et al, 2021), where SC has been widely implemented at a national level
The present findings support earlier work suggesting that the SC large group psychoeducational approach appears beneficial in reducing psychological distress (Delgadillo et al, 2016)
Summary
This review sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the ‘Stress Control’ (SC) large psychoeducational 6-session group programme developed to increase access to treatment for patients with anxiety and depression. Pre–post and post-treatment follow-up effect sizes were extracted and synthesized in a random effects meta-analysis, and variations in effect sizes were investigated via moderator analyses. Secondary analyses synthesized between-group effect sizes from controlled studies containing comparator treatments and calculated the average dropout rate. Pooled effect sizes indicated moderate pre–post treatment reductions in anxiety (ES = 0.58; CI 0.41 to 0.75; N = 5597; Z = 7.13; p < .001), moderate reductions in depression (ES = 0.62; CI 0.44 to 0.80; N = 5538, Z = 7.30; p < .001), and large reductions in global distress (ES = 0.86; CI 0.61 to 1.11; N = 591; Z = 7.41; p < .001). Conclusions are limited by the low methodological quality of the evidence
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.