Effectiveness of land use and disturbance measures, compared to climate, soil, and topography, for modeling relative abundances of tree species in the eastern United States

Abstract

Environmental factors control species distributions and abundances, but effectiveness of land use and disturbance variables for modeling species generally is unknown compared to climate, soil, and topography variables. Therefore, I used predictor variables from categories of 1) land use and disturbance, 2) climate, and 3) soil, topography, and wind speed to model the relative abundances (i.e., percentage of all trees) of 65 common tree species in the eastern United States, with a contrast to presence-absence models of species distributions. First, I modeled variables within each category to identify the five most important variables. Then, I combined variables from each category to isolate most important variables, based on five model combinations of input variables from each category, ranging from one (i.e., three total) to five (i.e., 15 total) variables. From the five models of combined categories for each tree species, I identified the model with the greatest R2 value. Overall, climate variables were most important for tree species models with one and two input variables from each category, but land use and disturbance variables were most important for models with three to five input variables from each category. Although a range of R2 values occurred by species and number of input model variables, 32 species had best models with greatest R2 values of 0.50 to 0.81. For all best species models, the most important variables were temperature of the warmest quarter, historical fire return interval for all fires, agricultural area during years 1850 to 1997, and precipitation of the driest month. Current land cover classes, which are accessible and the most commonly modeled land use variables, were not important for modeling tree species abundances or distributions. Climate variables were most important for modeling species distributions. Results support the concept that while climate sets soft boundaries on distributions, relative abundances within distributions are affected by other filters. Future modeling may establish other important land use and disturbance variables, or refinements within the important variables of historical fire return interval and agricultural area over time, advancing integration of both land use and climate variables into studies.