Effectiveness and safety of ferric carboxymaltose to treat iron deficiency anemia in cancer patients.

Abstract

e23153 Background: Most cancer patients are faced with anemia during the disease course. Iron deficiency (ID) is one of the major causes of anemia in cancer patients.Bleeding, malabsorption and organ dysfunction may cause iron deficiency in cancer patients. Anemia may result in a decrease in the patient's performance and delayed chemotherapy. Administration of intravenous (IV) iron is a therapeutic option in cancer patients with iron-deficiency related anemia. In this study we analyzed effectiveness and tolerability of ferric carboxymaltose in cancer patients with iron deficiency anemia Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 603 cancer patients who were treated with ferric carboxymaltose for anemia and iron-deficiency between October 2014 and April 2017 in a tertiary cancer clinic. Demographic data, cancer diagnoses, pre- and post-treatment hemoglobin levels, pre-treatment ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation (TSA) levels were recorded. Results: The median age of the population was 55 (22-90) years, and 52% were male. Of 603 patients, 47.9% (n = 289) had gastrointestinal malignancies and 17% (n = 103) had breast cancer. A total of 331 patients (55%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy and 272 patients (45%) were not on anti-cancer treatment. Median dose of the ferric carboxymaltose is 1000 mg (500-2000). The median baseline hemoglobin, ferritin and TSA were 10.7 (7-13) g/dl, 28 (2.9-2200) ng/ml and 9.3 (1-19) %, respectively. The median hemoglobin level at the 12th week of treatment was 12.7 g/dl. The median increase in hemoglobin was 2.9 (-0.10-6.9) g/dl in patients whom received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Only 2 patients had allergic reaction during IV ferric carboxymaltose administration and treatment was discontinued. Conclusions: Intravenous-iron improved hemoglobin levels both in actively treated and not-actively treated cancer patients. The effect has been shown in the first 3 months after injection. This approach is safe and tolerable. However, the impact of tumor progression on IV iron replacement is unclear, further studies are required.