Abstract

Current medical countermeasures (MCMs) for nerve agent poisoning have limited efficacy, and can cause serious adverse effects, prompting the requirement for new broad-spectrum therapeutics. Human plasma-derived butyrylcholinseterase (huBChE) is a promising novel bioscavenger MCM which has shown potential in animal studies, however, is economically prohibitive to manufacture at scale. This study addresses current challenges for the economical production of a bioactive and long-acting recombinant huBChE (rBChE) in mammalian cells by being the first to directly compare novel rBChE design strategies. These include co-expression of a proline rich attachment domain (PRAD) and fusion of BChE with a protein partner. Additionally, a pre-purification screening method developed in this study enables parallel comparison of the expression efficiency, activity and broad-spectrum binding to nerve agents for ten novel rBChE molecular designs. All designed rBChE demonstrated functionality to act as broad-spectrum MCMs to G, V and A series nerve agents. Expression using the ExpiCHO™ Max protocol provided greatest expression levels and activity for all constructs, with most rBChE expressing poorly in Expi293™. Fc- or hSA-fused rBChE significantly outperformed constructs designed to mimic huBChE, including PRAD-BChE, and proved an effective strategy to significantly improve enzyme activity and expression. Choice of protein partner, directionality and the addition of a linker also impacted fusion rBChE activity and expression. Overall, hSA fused rBChE provided greatest expression yield and activity, with BChE-hSA the best performing construct. The purified and characterised BChE-hSA demonstrated similar functionality to huBChE to be inhibited by GD, VX and A-234, supporting the findings of the pre-screening study and validating its capacity to assess and streamline the selection process for rBChE constructs in a cost-effective manner. Collectively, these outcomes contribute to risk mitigation in early-stage development, providing a systematic method to compare rBChE designs and a focus for future development.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.