Abstract
Simulated results from many urban runoff models are sensitive to the value used for impervious area. This paper explores the use of effective impervious area versus total impervious area for input to these models. Total impervious areas may be appropriate for black-box models but not for deterministic models. Potential problems of using total impervious area in deterministic models include that (1) runoff volumes and peak flows may be substantially overestimated for ungaged watersheds, (2) simulated changes in runoff due to increasing intensity of land use are likely to be smaller if total impervious area is used rather than effective impervious area, and (3) overestimates of infiltration parameters are likely if the model is calibrated using total impervious area and measured runoff data. Impervious-area data collected from 19 urban watersheds in the Denver metropolitan area showed strong relationships between effective impervious area, total impervious area, and land use.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.