Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have been used extensively to study P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a flexible multidrug transporter that is a key player in the development of multidrug resistance to chemotherapeutics. A substantial body of literature has grown from simulation studies that have employed various simulation conditions and parameters, including AMBER, CHARMM, OPLS, GROMOS, and coarse-grained force fields, drawing conclusions from simulations spanning hundreds of nanoseconds. Each force field is typically parametrized and validated on different data and observables, usually of small molecules and peptides; there have been few comparisons of force field performance on large protein-membrane systems. Here we compare the conformational ensembles of P-gp embedded in a POPC/cholesterol bilayer generated over 500 ns of replicate simulation with five force fields from popular biomolecular families: AMBER 99SB-ILDN, CHARMM 36, OPLS-AA/L, GROMOS 54A7, and MARTINI. We find considerable differences among the ensembles with little conformational overlap, although they correspond to similar extents to structural data obtained from electron paramagnetic resonance and cross-linking studies. Moreover, each trajectory was still sampling new conformations at a high rate after 500 ns of simulation, suggesting the need for more sampling. This work highlights the need to consider known limitations of the force field used (e.g., biases toward certain secondary structures) and the simulation itself (e.g., whether sufficient sampling has been achieved) when interpreting accumulated results of simulation studies of P-gp and other transport proteins.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call