Abstract

Technological progress demands accurate measurements of rapidly changing pressures. This, in turn, requires the use of dynamically calibrated pressure meters. The shock tube enables the dynamic characterization by applying an almost ideal pressure step change to the pressure sensor under calibration. This paper evaluates the effect of the dynamic response of a side-wall pressure measurement system on the detection of shock wave passage times over the side-wall pressure sensors installed along the shock tube. Furthermore, it evaluates this effect on the reference pressure step signal determined at the end-wall of the driven section using a time-of-flight method. To determine the errors in the detection of the shock front passage times over the centers of the side-wall sensors, a physical model for simulating the dynamic response of the complete measurement chain to the passage of the shock wave was developed. Due to the fact that the use of the physical model requires information about the effective diameter of the pressure sensor, special attention was paid to determining the effective diameter of the side-wall pressure sensors installed along the shock tube. The results show that the relative systematic errors in the pressure step amplitude at the end-wall of the shock tube due to the errors in the detection of the shock front passage times over the side-wall pressure sensors are less than 0.0003%. On the other hand, the systematic errors in the phase lag of the end-wall pressure signal in the calibration frequency range appropriate for high-frequency dynamic pressure applications are up to a few tens of degrees. Since the target phase measurement uncertainty of the pressure sensors used in high-frequency dynamic pressure applications is only a few degrees, the corrections for the systematic errors in the detection of the shock front passage times over the side-wall pressure sensors with the use of the developed physical dynamic model are, therefore, necessary when performing dynamic calibrations of pressure sensors with a shock tube.

Highlights

  • The development of different industrial sectors has brought an urgent need for pressure sensors with suitable dynamic properties

  • This paper evaluates the effect of the dynamic response of the side-wall pressure measurement system (PMS) on the detection of the times of the shock wave passages over the side-wall pressure sensors

  • This paper evaluates the effect of the dynamic response of the side-wall PMS on the detection of the times of the shock wave passages over the side-wall pressure sensors installed along the diaphragmless shock tube and, on the pressure step signal determined at the end-wall of the driven section using the TOF method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The development of different industrial sectors has brought an urgent need for pressure sensors with suitable dynamic properties. The uncertainties of the end-wall shock wave velocity Vwall and the arrival time of the shock front twall include the uncertainty of the extrapolation model, the uncertainty of the location of the end-wall, the uncertainties of the locations of the side-wall pressure sensors and the uncertainties of the detected times of the shock wave passages over these locations The latter strongly depend on the dynamic response of the side-wall pressure measurement system (PMS). In order to determine these systematic errors, a physical mathematical model that considers modelling the pressure input signal due to the transverse shock wave passage over the side-wall pressure sensors and the frequency response function of the complete measurement chain is required. This paper evaluates the effect of the dynamic response of the side-wall PMS on the detection of the times of the shock wave passages over the side-wall pressure sensors It evaluates its effect on the amplitude and the initial time of the pressure step at the end-wall determined using the TOF method.

Shock Tube Experimental Setup
1.42 MPa when increasing the initial driver gauge pressure from 4 MPa to 10 MPa
Physical Dynamic Model of the Side-Wall PMS
Results and Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call