Abstract
AbstractIn order to illustrate the effect of surface dilatational modulus on bubble break‐up, different pore‐throat visualized models were constructed using oil–wet poly(methyl methacrylate). Bubble generation was studied by comparing the snap‐off between lauroamide propyl betaine (LAB) with low surface dilatational modulus and LAB‐myristic acid with high surface dilatational modulus. In the homogeneous pore‐throat model, when bubbles of LAB flowed through the throat, only deformation occurred and no snap‐off was observed, while for bubbles of LAB‐myristic acid, repeated snap‐offs occurred. Experiments with isolated bubbles showed that a high surface dilatational modulus facilitates liquid flowing into the throat, which causes the snap‐off. Besides, the generated small bubbles contributed to the snap‐off of other following bubbles. In the pore‐throat model with large pores, the pores supplied enough space for bubbles passing through throat side by side, which facilitated the snap‐off.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
