Abstract

ABSTRACT Clarifying the components and regulatory mechanisms of evapotranspiration is essential for irrigation scheduling. In this study, straw mulching and non-mulching treatments were set up in a maize field with drip irrigation, where the water use and related factors were determined in 2014 and 2015. Straw mulching slightly reduced evapotranspiration by 2.6% on average for the two years. However, transpiration of straw mulching increased by 10.0% and 9.0% and soil evaporation decreased by 36.0% and 31.1%, compared to the non-mulching treatment for 2014 and 2015, respectively. Straw mulching decreased the average crop coefficients of the entire growth period (from 1.03 to 1.01) while increasing them in the mid-growth period (from 1.20 to 1.22). The net radiation above the canopy for straw mulching was 92.3%–96.3% of that for non-mulching treatment, which could explain the lower evapotranspiration of the mulching treatment. The daytime canopy conductance of straw mulching was 30% higher than that of non-mulching treatment, which could potentially result in higher biomass. This study provided essential parameters for water management of drip irrigation maize fields with straw mulching in similar areas.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call