Abstract
In sensing soil-moisture, there are inherent field related issues such as uncertainty and unpredictable distribution of minute amounts of trapped water and morphological changes of soil such as lumps and cracks due to desiccation. This poses problems for measurements done using a dual-probe heat-pulse (DPHP) technique that uses a narrow cylindrical sampling zone between heater and temperature probes. Thus, DPHP sensors are susceptible to errors. Hence, we studied and compared single-point and multi-point soil-moisture measurements using the heat-pulse technique. For this, we designed and developed a multi-point heat-pulse (MPHP) sensor with three temperature probes that enhanced the sampling zone to a volume of 840 mm3, which is three times that of the DPHP sensor. Sequentially deployed DPHP and MPHP sensors with spatial variations revealed that the maximum difference between the measured percentage of moisture from the DPHP sensor and standard oven-dried instrument was more than 10%, whereas for the MPHP sensor the discrepancy was only around 3%. Furthermore, when cracks appeared in the soil mass, it was observed that the discrepancy of DPHP sensor is around 16% while that for the MPHP sensor was still only 3%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
