Abstract
ABSTRACTIt is usually regarded as a common understanding that fatigue failure would not occur if all stresses were kept within fatigue limit diagram. However, it was shown that fatigue failure occurred in some special cases of variable amplitude loading condition even when all stresses were kept within fatigue limit diagram in the case of small‐notched specimen. The cause of such a phenomenon was examined using two‐step stress pattern for low alloy steel SCM440H. In the case of constant stress amplitude loading, non‐propagating crack was formed only at low mean stress and not formed at high mean stress. However, in the case of two‐step stress pattern in which the first step stress was chosen as R =−1 and the second step stress was with high mean stress, a non‐propagating crack was formed by the first step stress. This crack functioned as a pre‐crack for the second step stress with high mean stress. Consequently, fatigue failure occurred by the stresses within fatigue limit diagram. In this study, the effect of notch size and shape were examined. The effect of absorbed hydrogen was also investigated. Absorption of 0.3 ppm hydrogen caused more reduction of fatigue limit.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.