Effect of severe tricuspid regurgitation on the prognosis of patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation: the REVEAL-AFMR registry

Abstract

Abstract Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) often coexists with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), resulting from tricuspid annular dilatation by right atrial enlargement/dysfunction without balanced leaflet area enlargement. The clinical impact of TR coexisting with AFMR have not been well understood. Purpose We aimed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of TR coexisting with AFMR. Methods In 26 facilities in Japan, patients with AFMR defined with significant functional MR with dilated left atrium and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction were enrolled. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoints were the composite of all-cause death and re-hospitalization for HF readmission. Results We analyzed 829 cases (age 77±9 years, 55% male) with moderate or severe AFMR excluding moderate or greater valvular stenosis and severe valvular regurgitation. Of these, 14.5% (n=120) had severe TR. The prevalence of severe TR increased as the severity of AFMR worsened (Figure A). Patients with severe TR had a longer history of atrial fibrillation, elevated NT-proBNP levels, a higher rate of prior heart failure hospitalizations, and a higher rate of prescription of loop diuretics than those with non-severe TR. There were no significant differences in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and right ventricular S′ between the groups. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, existence of atrial fibrillation and its duration, and higher right atrial pressure were independent determinants of severe TR. Kaplan-Meier curves showed prognostic stratification by severe or non-severe TR for both all-cause mortality and the composite endpoints (p<0.001). Severe TR was significantly associated with both all-cause deaths and the composite endpoints after adjusted for covariates regardless of the severity of MR (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.74 [95% confidence interval 1.05-2.87], p=0.031 for all-cause deaths and adjusted HR 1.54 [1.03-2.30], p=0.033 for the composite endpoints) (Figure B). Conclusion Severe TR was associated with increased adverse events in patients with AFMR, independently of the severity of MR.