Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of full-scale computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with speed trial measurements for a ro-ro vessel and a general cargo vessel. Significant work has been done on validating CFD simulation in model scale. However, in full-scale very few publicly available studies have been conducted due to limited access of validation data. The present study includes extensive validation and verification of both resistance, propeller open-water and self-propulsion simulations in both model and full-scale. The self-propulsion simulations include modelling of the free surface and rotation of the 3D propeller. Full-scale resistance and propeller open-water as well as model scale self-propulsion simulations show good agreement with towing tank measurements and predictions. However, the full-scale self-propulsion simulations using the traditional approach of including the roughness as a point force estimated by an empirical formula significantly underestimate the power from the speed trial measurements. By including the effect of hull and propeller roughness directly into the CFD model, by modifying the wall functions, the discrepancy between CFD and speed trial measurements decreases significantly. This indicates that inclusion of a roughness model directly into the CFD simulation could be a more accurate method than the traditional approach of using empirical formulas originally designed for towing tank extrapolation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call