Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical characteristic and postoperative histopathological parameters in different prostate size and to assess the effect of prostate volume on histopathological outcomes in patients after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods Two hundred and sixteen patients from 2006 to 2011 who were proved prostatic carcinoma by biopsy and performed laparoscopic radical prostatectomy wewe retrospectively evaluated.All patients were divided into the small group ( < 30 ml,103 cases),intermediate group(30 -60 ml,71 cases) and large group ( >60 ml,42 cases) according to prostate volume.Clinical variables included age,body mass index (BMI),preoperative PSA level,prostate volume,percentage of positive needles,clinical stage,and biopsy Gleason score (GS).Histopathological parameters included pathological GS,upgrading or not compared to biopsy GS,pathological stage and surgical margins status.Preoperative clinical variables and postoperative histopatholgogical parameters were compared among the 3 prostate groups. Results Patients with smaller prostates had lower PSA levels than those with intermediate and larger prostates (P =0.000).They also had worse histopathological outcomes such as pathological GS ( P =0.034 ),upgrading of GS ( P =0.037 ),and pathological stage ( P =0.025 ).35.0% of patients in smaller prostate group had a positive surgical margin compare to 33.8% and 19.0% in intermediate and larger prostate groups,but there was no significant difference (P =0.152). Conclusion Men with smaller prostate may have more high-grade cancer and more advanced disease after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Key words: Prostatic neoplasms; Histopathological outcome; Prostatectomy; Retrospective studies

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call