Effect of Prostate Volume and Minimum Tumor Temperature on 4-Year Quality-of-Life After Focal Cryoablation Compared with Active Surveillance in Men with Prostate Cancer.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Background: The purpose of this study is to analyze quality-of-life (QoL) metrics in men treated with focal cryoablation (FC) compared with active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer over a 4-year follow-up period. We further investigated the effect of prostate size and minimum tumor temperature on QoL outcomes. Methods: An Institutional Review Board-approved database was reviewed for patients who underwent FC or AS. QoL questionnaire responses were collected and scores were analyzed for differences between FC and AS, between prostate volume <50 cc and ≥50 cc, and "cold" (<-78°C) and "warm" (≥-78°C) tumor temperatures. Results: One hundred forty-eight AS and 60 FC patients were included. Compared with AS, no significant difference existed in urinary function (UF) measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) (p = 0.593) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (p = 0.241), bowel habits (p = 0.370), or anxiety (p = 0.672) across time post-FC. FC had significantly worse sexual function (SF) compared with AS measured by EPIC (p < 0.0001) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (p < 0.0001). Patients with prostate volume <50 cc did not demonstrate differences between AS and FC in UF on EPIC (p = 0.459) or IPSS (p = 0.628), but FC patients had worse SF on EPIC (p < 0.001) and IIEF (p < 0.001). FC patients with a prostate volume ≥50 cc had better UF measured by IPSS (p < 0.05) and similar SF on EPIC (p = 0.162) and IIEF (p = 0.771) compared with AS. UF over time measured by EPIC (0.825) and IPSS (p = 0.658) was the same between AS, "warm," and "cold" FC groups. AS had significantly better SF than the "warm" and "cold" FC groups on EPIC (p < 0.001) and IIEF (p < 0.05). Conclusions: No differences were found in anxiety, urinary, or bowel function between AS and FC. Despite differences in SF, patients with larger prostates had no difference in SF and improved UF compared with AS. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed.