Abstract
To investigate the benefit of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in recurrent implantation failure (RIF). Secondary analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eight academic fertility centres in China, 2018-2020. Overall, 485 infertile women aged < 38 years were evaluated. They had a history of two or more unsuccessful embryo transfer cycles with at least three good-quality embryos that had been transferred cumulatively and underwent a single blastocyst transfer with or without PGT-A. Those with thin endometrium or recurrent pregnancy loss were excluded. Patients were categorised into PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups. All pregnancies were followed to delivery. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were obtained from obstetric and neonatal medical records. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to adjust for potential confounding factors. LBR per embryo transfer. There was no significant difference in LBR between the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups both before (39.1% vs. 41.5%, p = 0.760) and after (39.1% vs. 40.6%, p = 0.862) PSM. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models revealed no beneficial effect of PGT-A on LBR per embryo transfer (crude odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.49-1.69; adjusted odds ratio: 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.53-2.03). The incidence of maternal and neonatal complications was not significantly different between the groups. Patients with RIF aged < 38 years do not benefit from PGT-A. Thus, factors other than genetic abnormalities may contribute to this clinical conundrum.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.