Abstract
IntroductionNo matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. However, previous analyses suggest that patients transferred for non-clinical reasons have worse outcomes than those who are not transferred, but these studies were underpowered and hampered by residual case-mix differences. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons.MethodsWe carried out a propensity-matched cohort analysis comparing critical care patients who underwent a non-clinical critical care unit to unit transfer to another hospital with those who were not transferred. The primary outcome measure was mortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at ultimate discharge from critical care, plus length of stay in both critical care and acute hospital.ResultsA total of 308,323 patients were admitted to one of 198 adult general critical care units in England and Wales between January 2008 and September 2011. This included 759 patients who underwent a non-clinical transfer within 48 hours of admission to the unit and 1,518 propensity-matched patients who were not transferred. The relative risk of ultimate acute hospital mortality was 1.01 (95% confidence interval = 0.87 to 1.16) for the non-clinical transfer group, compared with patients who were not transferred but had a similar propensity for transfer. There was no statistically significant difference in ultimate critical care unit mortality. Transferred patients received on average three additional days of critical care (P < 0.001) but the difference in length of acute hospital stay was of only borderline significance (P = 0.05).ConclusionIn our analysis the difference in mortality between non-clinical transferred and nontransferred patients was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, non-clinical transfers received, on average, an additional 3 days of critical care. This has potential ramifications in terms of distress, inconvenience and cost for patients, their families, and the National Health Service. We therefore need further evidence, including qualitative data from family members and cost-effective analyses, to better understand the broader effects of non-clinical transfer.
Highlights
No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care
A propensity was calculated for 301,055 patients (97.6%), including 759 patients transferred for non-clinical reasons less than 48 hours after admission
Organisations including the UK Intensive Care Society have recommended that transfers for capacity reasons should only occur as a last resort, in part because of evidence about the risk of adverse events and the difficulties of delivering care outside the critical care setting [4]
Summary
No matter how well resourced, individual hospitals cannot expect to meet all peaks in demand for adult general critical care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of transferring adult general critical care patients to other hospitals for non-clinical reasons. The analysis was underpowered to detect a difference in hospital mortality and the study was limited by difficulties in finding matched control patients [7]. Randomisation would raise ethical issues, but propensity-based methods offer a way forward. They provide a better balance of covariates and have been used with success on critical care data [9,10,11]. Individual matched groups of cases and controls may differ in terms of specific characteristics (for example, gender), this approach aims to provide balance on patient characteristics across the study population
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
