Abstract
With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 kg ha−1 and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 t ha−1 with total N application rate of 180 kg ha−1 in AR and 120 kg ha−1 in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 t ha−1 in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 kg ha−1. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.