Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundRecurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment are still tough problems without effective treatments; thus, they are important research topics. There is controversy on whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) improves pregnancy outcomes in women with unexplained RPL and RIF. Moreover, currently, there is a paucity of reports on the role of LMWH in the entire population undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. This study aimed to estimate the effects of LMWH on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing FET cycles.MethodsThere were 1881 female patients included in the study. Of the 1881 patients, 107 underwent preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, which were analyzed individually. The patients were divided into two groups: the LMWH group received injections of 4100 IU/d LMWH from the day of transfer until 14 ± 2 days posttransplant, the control group was the comparison group (without LMWH use). The baseline characteristics and reproductive outcomes of the patients were reviewed.ResultsOf the 1774 women with normal FET cycles, no significant differences were found in the number of embryos implanted (1.31 ± 0.02 vs. 1.28 ± 0.02), embryo implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, late abortion rate, and ectopic pregnancy rate between the two groups. The LMWH group had a higher early abortion (17.8% [76/427] vs. 12.5% [55/439], p = 0.030). In the sub-group analysis, among the patients who underwent more than four transfers, the LMWH group had a lower late abortion rate (1.7% [1/60] vs. 13.2% [7/53], p = 0.043). Similarly, of the 107 women who underwent preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles, the reproductive outcomes were comparable between the two groups.ConclusionIn the general population and PGD patients, LMWH did not improve pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, the routine use of LMWH is not recommended for early treatment.