Abstract
This study aims to examine the effect of knowledge management and integrity on company performance through motivation as a mediating variable at PT. Kateloc Indonesia. The research sample was 283 employees. The data collection technique used questionnaires and data analysis used path analysis. The results showed that the knowledge management variable partially affected company performance. The integrity variable partially affects company performance. The motivation variable partially affects company performance. Knowledge management variables partially influence motivation. The integrity variable partially affects motivation. The influence of knowledge management on company performance is 0.548. The effect of knowledge management on performance through motivation is 0.676 X 0.868 = 0.587. In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the motivation variable is intervening. The direct effect of integrity on company performance is 0.659. Meanwhile, the influence of integrity on company performance through motivation is 0.782 X 0.868 = 0.679. In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the work motivation variable is intervening.
Highlights
This study aims to examine the effect of knowledge management and integrity on company performance through motivation as a mediating variable at PT
The results showed that the knowledge management variable partially affected company performance
The indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the work motivation variable is intervening
Summary
This study aims to examine the effect of knowledge management and integrity on company performance through motivation as a mediating variable at PT. The effect of knowledge management on performance through motivation is 0.676 X 0.868 = 0.587 In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the motivation variable is intervening. The influence of integrity on company performance through motivation is 0.782 X 0.868 = 0.679 In this case, the indirect effect is greater than the direct effect, so it can be said that the work motivation variable is intervening. Measures results, behavior, and normative, education, and the there have been many studies that have attempted to identify resulting concepts, including management development various factors that affect individual performance and company (Richard, 2010). Motivation is an impulse that market performance, such as expanding market share, and sales. causes a person to do an action to achieve a certain goal
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
