Effect of Hand and Ultrasonic Scaling-Root Planing Methods on Tooth Surface Topography: An In-Vitro Atomic Force Microscopy Study.

Abstract

Any instrumentation on the tooth surface for plaque or calculus removal will cause some amount of roughness on the tooth surface. Hence, this study was proposed to investigate the effects of hand and ultrasonic scaling and root planing on enamel and cementum, respectively. Forty tooth samples were prepared from extracted maxillary and mandibular first pre-molars and were divided randomly into four groups of 10 samples each. Group l: received ultrasonic scaling on enamel; Group II: received hand scaling on enamel surface; Group III: root planing with an ultrasonic unit on the cementum samples; and Group IV: root planing using hand curettes on cementum surface. The amount of roughness produced on the surface of each sample of all four groups was evaluated using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and statistically analyzed using Chi-square, ANOVA, and Wilcoxon tests. The results suggested that the surface roughness produced on both crown and root after scaling and root planing (SRP) using a hand instrument is lower than that of an ultrasonic unit. The roughness of the crown was found to be lower than that of the root after SRP using both a hand instrument and an ultrasonic unit and was also statistically significant (P= 0.034). In contrast, there is not enough evidence to conclude a significant difference (P=0.13) between root planing using hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler groups. The combined p-value using the Chi-square test (P=0.026) suggests a statistically significant overall difference between crown and root groups. From the present study, the authors concluded that scaling as well as root planing using an ultrasonic unit cause more tooth (enamel and cementum) surface roughness as compared to hand scaling and root planing. While there is no significant difference in the surface roughness of root-cementum produced due to the root planing in both groups, crown-enamel exhibits a significant difference after scaling in both groups. Clinical significance of the study: Rough, uneven tooth surfaces negatively influence the anticipated healing of the periodontium by providing retention areas for microbial dental plaque.