Abstract

Article Details: Received: 2020-08-20 | Accepted: 2021-01-19 | Available online: 2021-06-30 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2021.24.02.147-154 Genetically modified (GM) maize and traditional maize were tested experimentally to determine their effect on chicken serum biochemical parameters and metabolism. A total of 600 day-old chicks were divided into 2 experimental groups, namely: K, diet based on traditional maize (control); D, a diet based on GM maize (experiment). The experiment lasted 17 weeks, daily monitoring of population viability and feed consumption were carried out, at the age of 4, 8 and 17 weeks all birds were individually weighed. Blood samples for biochemical studies were taken from chickens at 4 weeks and 12 weeks of age (n= 6). Analytical studies did not show significant changes in serum biochemical parameters in group D chickens. A significant difference between the groups of chickens receiving GM and traditional maize was found only by the content of lipids after 4 weeks (P < 0.05) and cholesterol after 12 weeks of the experiment (P < 0.001). Also noted increasing level of CIC in serum of chickens that consumed feed from GM maize relative control at 32.2% (P < 0.01) after 4 weeks of the experiment. However, the studied indicators of metabolism and immune response in birds were within the physiological range. Certain fluctuations in the parameters during the experiment were observed in both groups, which indicates that there is no connection between this fact and the feeding factor. In addition, optimal results were obtained in terms of feed conversion and body weight of poultry, regardless of the feeding ration. The body weight of chickens at the age of 17 weeks in both groups was in the range of 1862.4-1895.6 g, feed consumption per 1 kg of body weight gain was 3.65-3.76 kg, the livestock viability – 96.6-97.3%. The results of the study do not indicate any danger to the metabolism and health of the bird due to the use of genetically modified feed, as no statistically significant differences within the studied parameters were observed. The noted certain small deviations fell within the limits of normal variations of the considered indicators and, thus, had no biological or toxicological value. Keywords: metabolism, growth performance, feeding, GM maize, chicken References Aeschbacher, K. et al. (2005). Bt176 corn in poultry nutrition: physiological characteristics and fate of recombinant plant DNA in chickens. Poultry Science, 84(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.385 Brake, J., Faust, M. & Stein, J. (2005). Evaluation of transgenic hybrid corn (VIP3A) in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 84(3), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.3.503 Chen, L. et al. (2016). Long-term toxicity study on genetically modified corn with cry1Ac gene in a Wuzhishan miniature pig model. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96(12), 4207–4214. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7624 Czerwiński, J. et al. (2015). The use of genetically modified Roundup Ready soyabean meal and genetically modified MON 810 maize in broiler chicken diets. Part 1. Effects on performance and blood lymphocyte subpopulations. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 24(2), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65640/2015 de Vos, C. J. & Swanenburg, M. (2018). Health effects of feeding genetically modified (GM) crops to livestock animals: A review. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 117(2018), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.031 El-Kelawy, M.I., ELnaggar, A.S. & Abdelkhalek, E. (2018). Productive performance, blood parameters and immune response of broiler chickens supplemented with grape seed and medicago sativa as natural sources of polyphenols. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 38(1), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2018.5665 Flachowsky, G., Halle, I. & Aulrich, K. (2005). Long term feeding of Bt-corn – a ten-generation study with quails. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 59(6), 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390500353549 Gao, C. et al. (2014). Effect of Dietary Phytase Transgenic Corn on Physiological Characteristics and the Fate of Recombinant Plant DNA in Laying Hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13265 Halle, I. & Flachowsky, G. (2014). A four-generation feeding study with genetically modified (Bt) maize in laying hens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 23(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65717/2014 Jianzhuang Tan. (2012). Comparison of broiler performance, carcass yields and intestinal microflora when fed diets containing transgenic (Mon-40-3-2) and conventional soybean meal. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(59). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb12.013 Korwin-Kossakowska, A. et al. (2016). Health status and potential uptake of transgenic DNA by Japanese quail fed diets containing genetically modified plant ingredients over 10 generations. British Poultry Science, 57(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1162281 Lu, L. et al. (2015). Influence of phytase transgenic corn on the intestinal microflora and the fate of transgenic DNA and protein in digesta and tissues of broilers. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0143408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143408 Lumeij, J. T. (1997). Avian Clinical Biochemistry. In Kaneko, J. J., Harvey, J. W. & Bruss, M. L. (Eds.). Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. (5. ed.). Academic Press (pp. 857–883). McNaughton, J. et al. (2011). Nutritional equivalency evaluation of transgenic maize grain from event DP-Ø9814Ø-6 and transgenic soybeans containing event DP-356Ø43-5: Laying hen performance and egg quality measures. Poultry Science, 90(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00973 Petrick, J. S., Bell, E. & Koch, M. S. (2019). Weight of the evidence: independent research projects confirm industry conclusions on the safety of insect-protected maize MON 810. GM Crops & Food, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2019.1680242 Řehout, V. et al. (2009). The influence of genetically modified Bt maize MON 810 in feed mixtures on slaughter, haematological and biochemical indices of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 18(3), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/66423/2009 Ritchie, B. W., Harrison, G. J. & Harrison, L. R. (1999). Avian medicine: principles and application. Delray Beach, Hbd International. Sartowska, K. E., Korwin-Kossakowska, A. & Sender, G. (2015). Genetically modified crops in a 10-generation feeding trial on Japanese quails. Evaluation of its influence on birds’ performance and body composition. Poultry Science, 94(12), 2909–2916. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev271 Scholtz, N. D. et al. (2010). Effects of an active immunization on the immune response of laying Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) fed with or without genetically modified Bacillus thuringiensis-maize. Poultry Science, 89(6), 1122–1128. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00678 Snell, C. et al. (2012). Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food and Chemical Toxicology: An International Journal Published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association, 50(3–4), 1134–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048 Stevens, L. (1996). Avian Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525773 Swiatkiewicz, S. et al. (2014). Genetically modified feeds and their effect on the metabolic parameters of food-producing animals: A review of recent studies. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 198, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.09.009 Szymczyk, B. et al. (2018). Results of a 16-week Safety Assurance Study with Rats Fed Genetically Modified Bt Maize: Effect on Growth and Health Parameters. Journal of Veterinary Research, 62(4), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2018-0060 Volosyanko, O. V., Kurylo, V. I. & Kravchuk, M. Y. (2019). Assessment of biological safety: A social and legal aspect. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(3), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.15421/2019_83 Yalçin, E. et al. (2018). Effects of feeding genetically modified (GM) maize on oxidative stress parameters in New Zealand rabbit. Global NEST Journal, 20(1), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002367 Zhang, S., Ao, X. & Kim, I. H. (2019). Effects of non-genetically and genetically modified organism (maize-soybean) diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass weight, and meat quality of broiler chicken. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 32(6), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0723

Highlights

  • Modified crops have become widespread among growers because they have advantages over isogenic counterparts in terms of plant protection from insect damage, weed control safety, and other benefits for maximum yields on minimum crops

  • 3 Results and discussion Feeding chickens with genetically modified maize during the experiment did not have a clear effect on growth, development and metabolism of poultry

  • The body weights of chickens fed Genetically modified (GM) maize compared to the control group were higher, 3%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modified crops have become widespread among growers because they have advantages over isogenic counterparts in terms of plant protection from insect damage, weed control safety, and other benefits for maximum yields on minimum crops. It should be noted that unofficial estimates Ukraine has large areas of GM soybean, up to 25% of GM material is detected in maize hybrids. Monitoring of one hundred samples maize from the fields of Dnipropetrovsk, Kiev and Cherkasy regions showed 25 cases of GM hybrids Bt176, MON 810 and GA21 (Volosyanko at al., 2019). Modified (GM) maize and soybeans are extensively studied by scientists from different countries for their equivalence to traditional crops in terms of chemical composition and fodder value. Numerous studies have shown that their inclusion in the feed of both broiler chickens and hens did not have a negative impact on the safety of livestock, live weight gain, egg production, feed conversion (McNaughton et al, 2011; Řehout at al., 2009; Tan at al., 2012), the number and diversity of microorganisms in the intestine (Lu at al., 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call