Abstract
BackgroundDuring early treatment of haemorrhagic shock maintenance of cerebral and end-organ oxygen supply by fluid resuscitation is mandatory. Gelatin-polysuccinat (GP) recently regained attention despite a still unclear risk profile and widely unknown effects on cerebral and peripheral microcirculation. This study investigates the effects of GP versus balanced electrolyte solution (BEL) with focus on cerebral regional oxygen saturation and peripheral microcirculation in a porcine haemorrhagic shock model.MethodsAfter Animal Care Committee approval haemorrhagic shock was induced by arterial blood withdrawal in 27 anaesthetized pigs. Consequently, the animals received rapid fluid resuscitation by either GP or BEL to replace the removed amount of blood, or remained untreated (n = 3 × 9). Over two hours cerebral regional oxygen saturation by near-infrared spectroscopy and peripheral buccal microcirculation by combined white-light spectrometry and laser-Doppler flowmetry were recorded. Secondary parameters included extended haemodynamics, spirometry, haematological and blood gas parameters.ResultsBoth fluid resuscitation regimes sufficiently stabilized the macro- and microcirculation in haemorrhagic shock with a more pronounced effect following GP infusion. GP administration led to a persisting, critical impairment of cerebral regional oxygen saturation through considerable haemodilution. Survival rates were 100% in both fluid resuscitation groups, but only 33% in the untreated control.ConclusionEqual amounts of GP and BEL sufficiently stabilize systemic circulation and microcirculatory perfusion. Forced fluid resuscitation by GP should be applied with caution to prevent haemodilution-induced impairment of cerebral oxygen delivery.
Highlights
During early treatment of haemorrhagic shock maintenance of cerebral and end-organ oxygen supply by fluid resuscitation is mandatory
We hypothesized that GP stabilizes the cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy-derived cerebral regional oxygen saturation more sufficiently than common balanced electrolyte solution (BEL) in a porcine model of haemorrhagic shock by high-volume blood withdrawal
Haemorrhagic shock was induced by blood withdrawal of 1046 ± 61 ml (36.6 ± 2.1 ml kg− 1), which was comparable in all three groups
Summary
During early treatment of haemorrhagic shock maintenance of cerebral and end-organ oxygen supply by fluid resuscitation is mandatory. This study investigates the effects of GP versus balanced electrolyte solution (BEL) with focus on cerebral regional oxygen saturation and peripheral microcirculation in a porcine haemorrhagic shock model. Negative side effects include renal failure with higher rates of renal replacement therapy and mortality [12,13,14] Other studies contradict these results, describe benefits for the patients and refuse the increase in mortality rates [14, 15]. This led to a negative risk assessment by the European Medicines Agency, and resulted in permission to use HES being temporarily revoked. Secondary outcome parameters include assessment of the peripheral microcirculation and extended cardio-circulatory monitoring
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have