Abstract

This work reports on a classroom-based study that investigated the role of field independence in the effectiveness of processing instruction. From a high school in Iran, fifty six learners were recruited and randomly assigned to an experimental and a comparison group. The former was taught through processing instruction while the latter received traditional output-based instruction on English passive. A sentence-level interpretation task was used in a pretest-treatment-posttest design to measure instructional effects. The results illustrated that processing instruction significantly improved learners’ acquisition of the target structure, whereas the traditional instruction was not effective. Furthermore, no interaction was found between the learners’ field independence and their performance in the immediate and delayed posttests. This could be attributed to the unique characteristic of processing instruction and its systematic nature neutralising learners’ differences and consequently creating an optimum learning condition benefitting all the learners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.