Effect of fertilizer nitrogen source and cattle slurry on herbage production and nitrogen utilization

Abstract

AbstractA field plot experiment was carried out on an established grassland sward from 1983–88 inclusive to examine the effects of time of application, chemical form of nitrogen (N) and cattle slurry dry matter (DM) content on yield and efficiency of N use. Four forms of fertilizer N (a semi‐organic fertilizer, a combined 2.1:1 (w/w) semi‐organic/calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fertilizer, CAN and urea, each supplying 300 kg N ha−1 year−1, were applied with or without unseparated or separated cattle slurry at 93 and 73 g kg−1 DM respectively, both supplying approximately 150 kg N ha−1 year−1. All fertilizers and slurries were applied in three equal dressings (February/March, May/June and July/August). The efficiency of use of fertilizer and slurry N was evaluated by measuring DM yield, N uptake and apparent recovery of N in herbage at all harvests during each growing season.Fertilizer N application significantly increased (P<0.001) the mean yields of herbage at each harvest in all years. The form of fertilizer N had no significant effect (P>0.05) on first harvest and total herbage yields, nor on N uptakes by herbage at the first harvest in any year. The performance of urea and of CAN was more variable at the second and third harvests relative to that of the semi‐organic or combined 2.2:1 (w/w) semi‐organic/CAN sources which had similar efficiencies of N use. Lower DM production was associated with reduced uptake of N. Values for mean overall apparent recovery of N ranged from 57.9 ± 2.67% for the semi‐organic fertilizer to 50.2±3.05% for CAN.Unseparated cattle slurry and separated cattle slurry produced similar herbage yields and N responses that were lower and more variable than with fertilizer N. The overall mean apparent recovery of N from unseparated cattle slurry was 25.5 ± 5.03% compared to 5.0 ± 4.74% for separated cattle slurry. Efficiency of N use was highest with spring applications and least with mid‐season applications. Recoveries ranged from −29% for separated cattle slurry applied in June 1984 to 56% for unseparated and separated cattle slurry applied in February 1988 and June 1987 respectively. No interactions were recorded between cattle slurry and fertilizer N in terms of DM production or N uptake by herbage.The results of this study support the use of a fertilizer N source, selected on a least‐cost basis, in combination with slurry to promote spring herbage production. For subsequent production, N should be supplied in fertilizer form only. The use of urea is risky under low rainfall conditions. Mechanical separation did not improve the efficiency of use of slurry N.