Abstract
본 실험은 유휴 논토양에 톨 페스큐를 재배하였을 때, 액상우분뇨를 물로 희석하거나 희석하지 않고 시기를 다르게 시용하여 계절별 및 연간 건물수량과 사료가치를 조사하고 화학비료 시비에 따른 건물수량과 사료가치도 비교하여 액상우분뇨의 적정 시용 시기와 희석수준을 결정하고자 실시되었으며, 그 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1) 액상우분뇨를 물로 희석하지 않거나 희석하여 시용하였을 때 연간 건물수량이 ha당 각각 <TEX>$10.57{\sim}12.51$</TEX> 톤(평균 11.50 ton DM/ha)과 <TEX>$11.31{\sim}14.81$</TEX> 톤 (평균 13.13 ton DM/ha)으로 무시비구의 ha당 9.21톤 보다 높은 건물수량을 나타내었는데(Table 2), 액상우분뇨를 이른봄과 여름철 시용한 구(SA구)와 이른 봄, 늦봄 및 여름철 분할 시용한 구(SUA구) 그리고 액상우분뇨를 물로 희석하여 봄철에 전량 시용한 구(DS구), 이른봄과 여름철에 시용한 구(DSA 구) 및 이른 봄, 늦봄 및 여름철에 분할 시용한 구(DSUA구) 등에서 무시비구 보다 유의하게 높은 건물수량을 나타내었다(p<0.05). 2) 질소와 인산 및 칼리를 시비한 구에서는 ha당 15.38 톤의 연간 건물수량을 나타내어 무시비구와 인산과 칼리 시비한 구(10.68 톤/ha) 보다도 유의하게 높은 건물수량을 나타내었다(p<0.05). 또한 인산과 칼리 시용구의 연간 건물수량은 액상우분뇨 시용구의 평균 연간 건물 수량보다도 낮았다. 3) 화학비료구에서 무기태 질소의 건물생산 효율은 연 평균 31.3kg DM/kg N이었으며, 예취 시기별로 보면 2번초>1번초>3번초 순으로 낮아졌지만 액상우분뇨 질소의 연간 건물생산 효율은 무 희석구와 희석구가 각각 15.3과 26.1kg DM/kg N을 나타내었고 2번초에서 가장 높았다. 한편 무기태 질소 대비 액상우분뇨 질소의 건물생산효율은 무희석구와 희석구가 각각 48.9와 83.4%에 도달하였다. 4) 톨 페스큐의 연간 평균 조단백질 함량은 액상우분뇨 시용구에서 <TEX>$9.9{\sim}11.6%$</TEX>로 무시비구의 9.5%와 화학비료 구의 <TEX>$9.0{\sim}9.8%$</TEX> 보다 유의하게 높았지만(p<0.05), 연간 평균 NDF와 ADF 함량은 무시비구가 가장 낮았고 무시비구의 상대 사료가치(RFV)와 TDN 함량은 모든 처리구보다 유의하게 높았다(p<0.05). 5) 액상우분뇨 시용과 희석시용으로 톨 페스큐의 연간 조단백질 수량과 가소화 양분수량은 무시비구 및 인산과 칼리를 시용한 구 보다 유의하게 높았는데(p<0.05), 이러한 경향은 액상우분뇨를 희석하여 이른 봄, 늦봄 및 여름철에 분할 시용한 구(DSUA구)에서 더욱 뚜렷하였다. This experiment was conducted to investigate effects of application of diluted and undiluted cattle slurry with water on seasonal and annual dry matter yields and feed values of tall fescue in the uncultivated rice paddy and it was compared with chemical fertilizer in order to determine optimal application season and dilution level of cattle slurry. When diluted or undiluted cattle slurry with water was applied to uncultivated rice paddy, annual dry matter yields showed 11.31 to 14.81 ton DM/ha (average 13.13 ton DM/ha) for diluted and 10.57 to 12.51 ton DM/ha (average 11.50 ton DM/ha) for undiluted cattle slurries, these had a higher dry matter yield than those of no fertilizer (9.21 ton DM/ha). Furthermore, separate application of early spring and summer (SA plots), separate application of early and late spring, and summer (SUA plots) fur undiluted cattle slurries, and whole application of spring (DS plots), separate application of early spring and summer (DSA plots), separate application of early and late spring, and summer (DSUA plots) for diluted cattle slurries were significantly (P<0.05) higher for annual dry matter yield than no fertilizer plots. Plots applied chemical fertilizer with nitrogen (N), phorphorus (P) and potassium (K) had 15.38 ton DM/ha annually, resulted in significantly (P<0.05) higher DM yield than chemical fertilizer containing P and K, and no fertilizer plots. Moreover, average annual DM yield for the chemical fertilizer with P and K was lower than that of cattle slurry applications. The efinciency of DM production for mineral nitrogen of chemical fertilizers was annually average 31.3 kg DM/kg N. In terms of cutting time of tall fescue, it was lowered in the order of 2nd growth followed by 1st and 3rd growth. However, efficiencies of annual DM production of nitrogen for diluted and undiluted cattle slurries were 26.1 and 15.3 kg DM/kg N, respectively, especially, highest in 2nd growth. While, efficiencies of DM production for cattle slurry versus for mineral nitrogen were 48.9 (undiluted) and 83.4% (diluted), respectively. For annual crude protein (CP) contents of tall fescue, aqueous cattle slurry applications showed 9,9 to 11.6%, which were significantly (P<0.05) higher than no fertilization (9.5%) and chemical fertilizer (9.0 to 9.8%), but annual average NDF and ADF contents were lowest in no fertilization. On the contrary, relative feed value (RFV) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) of no fertilizer plots were significantly (P<0.05) higher than the other plots. The application of cattle slurry and their dilution significantly increased yields of crude protein and total digestible nutrients compared with no and/or P and K fertilizers (P<0.05). These trends were much conspicuous in water-diluted cattle slurries applied in the early and late spring and summer, separately (DSUA plots).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.