Effect of Embedded Basement Stories on Seismic Response of Low-Rise Building Frames Considering SSI via Small Shaking Table Tests

Abstract

The dynamic soil-structure interaction is a combination of phenomena caused by the flexibility of soil foundation in structure response. The structure response may be changed by embedded basement stories. Thus, this study seeks to assess the dynamic response of seven-story concrete frame type buildings without a basement, one basement story, and two basement stories, considering fixed and flexible bases. For this purpose, the experimental tests on the small shaking table were executed with a small scaling coefficient of 1:50. Consequently, three scaled models of steel skeleton structures with variable embedded depths have been constructed with fixed and flexible bases. These models are exposed to three seismic input motions: Northridge (1994), Kobe (1995), and Chi-Chi (1999) at the base of the structure as a fixed base and the bedrock level in the soil structure system as a flexible base. The finite element technique is carried out for scaled and real models. Both the scaled and real numerical models are in good agreement with the obtained experimental observations with reasonable accuracy. It is concluded that the lateral deflections are overestimated by excluding embedded depths of structural elements. In the flexible prototype model, the lateral deflections of the superstructure with embedded depths (3 m, 6 m) decrease compared with no embedded depth, in which the maximum reduction percentages of 7-story with embedded depths 3 m and 6 m at the roof floor level are 21% and 42% compared with no embedded depth, respectively, under Northridge earthquake. Otherwise, ignoring the SSI effects (fixed base case), the lateral displacements are underestimated compared with the flexible base. The maximum amplification percentages at the roof floor level between flexible and fixed bases models with variable embedded depths are 35%, 37%, and 65% under Northridge, Kobe, and Chi-Chi earthquakes, respectively. The amplification and reduction percentages may be high or low, mainly depending on soil condition (fixed, flexible), variable embedded depths, characteristics of seismic motion, travel pass, and source of seismic motion. These items are summarized as the frequency domain of the coupled system compared with the frequency domain of the earthquake motion.