Abstract

The nonlinear seismic responses of steel frames with fully restrained, partially restrained and composite connections are evaluated and compared in terms of the maximum interstory and maximum top lateral displacements. Steel frames are usually analyzed assuming all the connections are fully restrained. However, considering the practical design aspects of connections, this is rarely true. This practice introduces unintended flexibility in the frame. Using a nonlinear time domain seismic analysis algorithm developed by the authors, three steel frames are excited by 13 earthquake time histories. Twelve of them were recorded during the Northridge earthquake of 1994. Any one of these 12 earthquake time histories can be used to represent the Northridge earthquake in future designs. To define the rigidity of a connection, a parameter called the T ratio is introduced. It is the ratio of the moment the connection would have to carry according to the beam line theory and the fixed end moment of the girder. Initially, the T ratio of all the connections is assumed to be 0.9, making them fully restrained. The results indicate that this assumption is inappropriate and gives unconservative responses depending upon which time history of the same earthquake is being used. Several frames with a T ratio of 0.95 developed very large lateral displacements causing instability, although they behaved properly when the ratio was assumed to be 1.0. For composite connections, slab steel has a significant beneficial effect on the overall structural response. It increases the T ratio, making it closer to the FR connection. Even for composite connections with a T ratio of 0.95, the frames developed large lateral displacement. Further parametric study indicates that, at least for seismic analysis, PR or composite connections should be designed for a T ratio as close to 1 as possible to represent an FR connection. Otherwise, the lateral displacement failure criterion should also be checked for less than ideal FR connection conditions. Improvements in both the analysis and design of steel frames are necessary to make them more seismic load tolerant.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.