Abstract

IntroductionSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disease affecting digital microcirculation, leading to finger ulcers and in some cases to amputation. Prostacyclin analogues can be used intravenously but their therapeutic effect is counterbalanced by potentially serious vasodilatation-induced side effects. Iontophoresis of treprostinil could be a promising local therapeutic alternative for SSc-related digital ulcers. Iontophoretic drug delivery is complex, and whether continuous or periodic current should be used remains debated. The objective of the present work is to compare the effect of continuous vs pulsed iontophoresis of treprostinil in rats. Materials and methodsTreprostinil (0.64mM and 0.064mM) and NaCl were delivered by cathodal iontophoresis onto the hindquarters of anaesthetized rats. Three protocols delivering the same quantity of current were compared: one was continuous (100μA during 20min) and two were periodic (B: twenty 1-min cycles with 200μA during 30s followed by 30s Off; and C: twenty 1-min cycles with 600μA during 10s followed by 50s Off) (n=8 for each protocol with each concentration). Skin blood flow was quantified using laser Doppler imaging and skin resistance was calculated with Ohm’s law. ResultsAll protocols induced a significant increase in skin blood flow. At the lower concentration (0.064mM treprostinil) the pulsed 10/50 sequence significantly enhanced cutaneous blood flow (Table 1; Fig. 1B) compared to continuous iontophoresis or the 30/30 sequence. We noted that the pulsed iontophoresis of NaCl (10/50 sequence) induced a significant early increase in cutaneous blood flow in comparison with continuous iontophoresis. Skin resistance measures were negatively correlated with current intensity delivered. ConclusionIn conclusion, pulsed iontophoresis of treprostinil with a 10s/50s (On/Off) protocol at 600μA increases the efficacy of iontophoresis at 0.064mM but not at a tenfold higher concentration. Pulsed iontophoresis could be used to optimize treprostinil iontophoresis, to provide similar efficacy with decreased costs, and should now be tested on humans.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call