Abstract

Fibers spun by melt spinning of binary and ternary polypropylene/polyethylenetherephthalate blends have been produced and characterized in order to investigate the effect of a compatibilizer on their morphology and mechanical properties. The compatibilizer was a maleic anhydride-functionalized rubber copolymer. The effect of the compatibilizer was well evident in the isotropic state, as the morphology became very fine, the size of the dispersed particles was very small, and the adhesion was better. The effect of the compatibilizer on the mechanical properties is very relevant, especially in the elongation at break. On the contrary, no relevant effect was observed in the anisotropic oriented fibers. Although the average diameter of the microfibrils of the dispersed phase of the compatibilized blend generated during the hot drawing was much smaller than that of the microfibrils of the same particles of the uncompatibilized blend, the mechanical properties were almost the same. This behavior has been attributed to the length of the smaller microfibrils of the ternary blends, which was lower that of the microfibrils of the binary blend. This has been explained in terms of reduced initial droplet size, and therefore of lesser possibility of stretching the droplets to very long fibrils in these samples.

Highlights

  • Blends of different polymers may represent a valid alternative for the production of materials with new characteristics without designing new synthesis that are often complex, expensive, and with a high environmental impact

  • The polymer used as compatibilizer was Kraton FG 1901X which is a SEBS (Styrene Ethylene Butylene Styrene) copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride

  • PET and thepresence maleic anhydride took place—according to the reactions reported in Figure 1—during extrusion in the of the compatibilizer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Blends of different polymers may represent a valid alternative for the production of materials with new characteristics without designing new synthesis that are often complex, expensive, and with a high environmental impact. A key factor in blending different polymers is that in most cases they are immiscible and incompatible; i.e., they display a gross morphology with particles of the dispersed phase poorly adherent to the matrix and poorly distributed into the continuous phase. The mechanical properties are poor, and any commercial use is hindered. In these cases, an appropriate compatibilizing system can significantly improve the morphology, and the mechanical properties [1,2,3,4,5]. The tensile strength of PP is high enough for common textile and technical applications; its Young's modulus, has a low value that limits

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call