Educational and Clinical Outcome Measures in an Integrated Hand Service

Abstract

BackgroundWe recently sought to integrate our orthopaedic and plastic hand surgeons with the goal of improving education, patient care, and providing seamless, continuous coverage for our trauma center. Our hypothesis was that integration could serve both the orthopaedic and plastic surgery training programs well and provide more consistent care for the trauma patients. Materials and MethodsProgram director approval was granted for blinded analysis of case logs from plastic and orthopaedic surgery programs from 2012 through 2019. Data on mean and total number of hand cases were analyzed and compared for both specialties. Institutional Review Board approval was granted for a retrospective review of patient outcomes. ResultsFor both orthopaedic and plastics resident trainees, the mean number of hand cases increased during this study period suggesting that the integration had a favorable impact on both programs. The mean number of hand cases for orthopaedic residents rose from 163 to 246. The mean number of hand cases for plastic surgery residents rose from 218 to 295. Patient outcomes as reflected in length of stay and time to consultation also improved. ConclusionTo improve hand surgical training and patient care, an integrated orthoplastics approach to hand surgery was implemented at our institution. Plastic surgery trainees are completing more hand surgery cases in an integrated model (p < 0.001), including fracture care (p < 0.047). Orthopaedic surgery trainees have doubled the percentage of integumentary and microsurgery cases in the integrated model (p < 0.001). The educational and clinical changes affected in an integrated model have changed the paradigm for educating future hand surgeons at our institution.