Abstract

Mastering a rich repertoire of motor behaviors, as humans and other animals do, is a surprising and still a poorly understood outcome of evolution, development, and learning. Many degrees-of-freedom, non-linear dynamics, and sensory delays provide formidable challenges for controlling even simple actions. Modularity as a functional element, both structural and computational, of a control architecture might be the key organizational principle that the central nervous system employs for achieving versatility and adaptability in motor control. Recent investigations of muscle synergies, motor primitives, compositionality, basic action concepts, and related work in machine learning have contributed, at different levels, to advance our understanding of the modular architecture underlying rich motor behaviors. However, the existence and nature of the modules comprising the control architecture is far from settled. For instance, regularity and low-dimensionality of the motor output are often taken as an indication of modularity but they could simply be a byproduct of optimization and task constraints. Moreover, what are the relationships between modules at different levels, such as muscle synergies, kinematic invariants, and basic action concepts? One important reason for the new interest in understanding modularity in motor control from different perspectives is the impressive development in cognitive robotics. In comparison to animals and humans, the motor skills of today's best robots are limited and inflexible. However, robot technology is maturing to the point at which it can start approximating a reasonable spectrum of different perceptual, cognitive, and motor capabilities. These advances allow researchers to explore how these motor, sensory, and cognitive functions might be integrated into meaningful architectures and to test their functional limits. Such systems provide a new test bed to explore different concepts of modularity and to experimentally investigate possible interactions between motor and cognitive processes. Thus, the goal of this Research Topic is to review, compare, and debate theoretical and experimental studies of the modular organization of the motor control system at different levels. By bringing together researchers seeking to understand the building blocks of coordinating many muscles, planning endpoint and joint trajectories, and representing motor and behavioral actions in memory we aim at promoting new interactions between often disconnected research areas and approaches and providing a broad perspective on the notion of modularity in motor control.

Highlights

  • Mastering a rich repertoire of motor behaviors, as humans and other animals do, is a surprising and still a poorly understood outcome of evolution, development, and learning

  • Regularity and low-dimensionality of the motor output are often taken as an indication of modularity but they could be a byproduct of optimization and task constraints

  • What are the relationships between modules at different levels, such as muscle synergies, kinematic invariants, and basic action concepts?

Read more

Summary

Reviews and Perspectives

A number of review articles present and discuss available evidence, conceptual frameworks, and fundamental questions concerning modularity in motor control These cover a range of issues such as the effective dimensionality, movement invariants, neural underpinnings, evolution, motor learning, and recovery of motor function. In a thought-provoking review article, Duysens et al (2013) argue that there is large overlap between the notions on modules and the older concepts of reflexes They reason that facilitation of the flexor synergy at the end of the stance phase is linked to the activation of circuitry that is responsible for the generation of locomotor patterns (CPG, “central pattern generator”). Ivanenko et al (2013) review various examples of adaptation of locomotor patterns in patients and discuss the findings in a general context of compensatory gait mechanisms, spatiotemporal architecture, and modularity of the locomotor program Such investigations may have important implications related to the construction of gait rehabilitation technology. Further research needs to clarify whether plasticity in muscle patterns originates from sharing common modules or by creating new muscle synergies and whether the rehabilitation programs may benefit from revitalizing the modules underlying motor behaviors

Muscle Synergies
Motor Primitives at the Kinematic Level
Neural Substrates
Intermittent Control
Action Representation
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.