Editorial Commentary.

Abstract

No AccessUrology PracticePatient Care1 Sep 2021Editorial CommentaryThis article comments on the following:Synchronous Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Short-Term Outcomes from a Statewide Claims Database Nabeel A. Shakir, and Lee C. Zhao Nabeel A. ShakirNabeel A. Shakir Department of Urology, New York University, New York, New York More articles by this author , and Lee C. ZhaoLee C. Zhao Department of Urology, New York University, New York, New York More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000237.02AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "Editorial Commentary." Urology Practice, 8(5), p. 570 Reference 1. : Is risk of artificial urethral sphincter cuff erosion higher in patients with penile prosthesis?J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1432. Google Scholar © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesUrology PracticeJun 25, 2021, 12:00:00 AMSynchronous Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Short-Term Outcomes from a Statewide Claims Database Volume 8Issue 5September 2021Page: 570-570 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Nabeel A. Shakir Department of Urology, New York University, New York, New York More articles by this author Lee C. Zhao Department of Urology, New York University, New York, New York More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...