Editorial: Case Studies and Series: A Call for Action and Invitation for Submissions

Abstract

In 1995, the associate editors of the Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP) published an article to encourage the submission of case reports, studies, and series (Drotar, LaGreca, Lemanek, & Kazak, 1995), which had been remarkably underrepresented in the portfolio of published articles. Apparently, this article did little to encourage submissions of case studies and series because the situation is unchanged. But being undaunted and persistent, I would like to revisit this issue in light of the continuing importance of case studies and series to the field of pediatric psychology. In its formative years, JPP published many case studies, series, and descriptions of programs (e.g., Bachara & Lamb, 1976; Davidson, Adams, Schroeder, & Tyler, 1978; O’Malley & Koocher, 1977). At that time, pediatric psychologists published such work in order to call attention to important and challenging clinical problems, as well as to share their experiences, ideas, and data concerning clinical practice. Given the state of the art of the science at that time, early case studies and series focused more on description of clinical problems and intervention methods than on empirical demonstrations of treatment efficacy, with some notable exceptions (e.g., Barnard, Christophersen, & Wolf, 1976; Linscheid, Copeland, Jacobstein, & Smith, 1981; Varni, 1980). What conclusion should we draw from the fact that recent submissions to and publications of case studies and series in JPP are so few and far between? Is it the case that the field of pediatric psychology has moved beyond the need for case studies and series to inform clinical practice and research? In fact, the standards for the evaluation of science in our field, including studies of intervention efficacy (Spirito & Kazak, 2006), are much higher now than they were in the early days of the field. Are case studies and series no longer relevant or competitive for publication in JPP? Another possibility is that pediatric psychologists have simply stopped trying to write up their case studies for JPP because they do not see it as a ready outlet for publication. Alternatively, they could be writing them, but submitting them to journals other than JPP. It’s hard to know. As the current editor of JPP, I believe that case studies and series have not outlived their usefulness and that the field of pediatric psychology will continue to benefit from their publication. To address this issue, this editorial has the following goals: (1) underscore the continuing need for the publication of case studies and series in JPP; (2) clarify issues that need to be considered in preparing and reviewing case studies and series; (3) suggest ways to enhance publishability; and (4) invite authors to submit manuscripts that focus on case studies and series.