Abstract
Methanol production can utilize various feedstock, such as natural gas, coal, biomass, and CO2 hydrogenation, each with distinct economic and environmental implications. Natural gas, particularly from remote or stranded reserves, is the most cost-effective due to its abundance and lower syngas production costs. However, syngas production represents over half the capital cost in gas-to-liquid plants. Coal-based methanol is viable in coal-rich areas but faces higher carbon emissions. Biomass-to-methanol processes offer renewable energy solutions and potential carbon neutrality but are challenged by higher costs and technical complexities. CO2 hydrogenation shows promise for reducing greenhouse gas emissions but requires advancements in catalyst efficiency and renewable hydrogen. This chapter compares these methods, providing a comprehensive economic assessment of methanol production pathways and emphasizing the potential of renewable sources in enhancing methanol production's economic and environmental sustainability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.