Abstract
The economics literature dealing with nuclear energy and uranium is inadequate, and several extremely important topics deserve a more methodical treatment. This survey provides: an alternative derivation for the optimal mix of generating capacity; a systematic but essentially non-technical approach to the nuclear fuel cycle; some comments on alternative technologies; and a stock-flow analysis of the market for uranium. It is also argued: that existing nuclear facilities in countries like Sweden can compete with all fossil fuels in the generation of electricity; and that claims that unconventional or renewable energy sources are economic at the present time are misleading, and might serve to accelerate the introduction of a plutonium-based energy economy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
