Abstract

Uncertainty surrounding the future cost of energy can contribute significantly to the economic risk associated with large building complexes. A methodology for measuring this risk and incorporating it into the design decision-making process is presented. It involves a first and second moment or mean and variance description of life cycle cost. This information may be aggregated into a single number using expected utility theory for the purpose of ranking design alternatives. A case study which deals with various energy conservation strategies for a 30-storey office complex is presented to demonstrate the significance of economic risk for large projects and the dependence of design alternative rankings on the decision criteria selected.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call