Abstract
We examine the economic performance (inflation and growth) associated with different monetary policy frameworks, presenting unconditional and conditional analyses, and using predictions of countries’ monetary policy framework choices to address the issue of endogeneity. We find some differences in performance associated with the different monetary policy frameworks, together with a general improvement over time which is explained in part by the trends towards inflation targeting and more precise monetary control, that is from changes in the choice of framework, but in part, and perhaps more strongly, reflects a more general trend towards better economic performance related to changes in decision-making within the frameworks. Our results suggest that the choice of MPF is an important, but by no means the only, determinant of economic performance, and therefore not the only consideration for policymakers looking to improve economic performance.
Highlights
In this paper we explore the economic performance associated with different monetary policy frameworks (MPFs) in advanced and emerging economies, using the classification developed by Cobham (2021)
For the degree of monetary control (DOC) MPF variables we find MPFs classified as intermediate control have higher inflation relative to those classified as substantial control across both advanced and emerging economies, and that advanced economies MPFs classified as intensive control experience lower inflation relative to the benchmark
We have presented a wide range of results on the economic performance associated with different monetary policy frameworks
Summary
Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106985/ MPRA Paper No 106985, posted 06 Apr 2021 01:44 UTC. Connor Mason (formerly Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland UK) Mengdi Song (New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates), Revised April 2021
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have