Abstract
The paper aims at bridging economic and management discourse on Heritage Conservation, calling for a kind of ethnographic approach to administrative aspects. Drawing attention to practices more than policies, the paper takes a distance from mainstream cultural economics. More than cultural capital, the emphasis is on running operations, current costs and revenues, once the investment (in conservation and opening of the site) is done. At first, an assumption of autonomy of the individual entity in charge of the heritage site is introduced, to set up a basic analytical framework. Soon after, however, the issue of partial autonomy of heritage entities is posed, as part of a quite general administrative tradition outside the Anglo American world. Implications and cautions needed for the analysis are discussed. In addition, the paper relates these general elements in the study of heritage organizations with the more specific theme of the “Nara issue”, the call for a more pluralistic, less Western-centered, view of the heritage field. This means addressing also the issue of a variety of administrative traditions, which need to be investigated, and understood, to make change possible.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.