Ecological traits modulate bird species responses to forest fragmentation in an Amazonian anthropogenic archipelago

doi:10.1111/ddi.13106

Abstract

Diversity and DistributionsVolume 26, Issue 8 p. 1053-1053 CORRIGENDUMOpen Access Ecological traits modulate bird species responses to forest fragmentation in an Amazonian anthropogenic archipelago This article corrects the following: Ecological traits modulate bird species responses to forest fragmentation in an Amazonian anthropogenic archipelago Anderson Saldanha Bueno, Sidnei M. Dantas, Luiza Magalli Pinto Henriques, Carlos A. Peres, Diederik Strubbe, Volume 24Issue 3Diversity and Distributions pages: 387-402 First Published online: January 18, 2018 First published: 06 July 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13106AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In the version of this paper originally published (Bueno et al., 2018), some mistakes were made in the following sentences: On page 388, under Section 1 Introduction, third paragraph, where it reads “wide geographic range,” it should read “narrow geographic range.” On page 389, under Section 2.1 Study area, first paragraph, where it reads “(IUCN category VI),” it should read “(IUCN category V).” On page 392, under Section 3.1 Species–area relationships and forest fragmentation effect, second paragraph, where it reads “habitat generalists (124 + 1 > 104.7; Figure 2b). In contrast, this trend was reversed for forest specialists (83 + 1 < 109.1; Figure 2c),” it should read “habitat generalists (124 + 1 > 104.7; Figure 2c). In contrast, this result was reversed for forest specialists (83 + 1 < 109.1; Figure 2b).” On page 396, under Section 4.1 Species–area relationships and forest fragmentation effect, fourth paragraph, where it reads “forest specialists (positive) and habitat generalists (negative),” it should read “forest specialists (negative) and habitat generalists (positive).” The authors apologize for any confusion this may have caused. Reference Bueno, A. S., Dantas, S. M., Henriques, L. M. P., & Peres, C. A. (2018). Ecological traits modulate bird species responses to forest fragmentation in an Amazonian anthropogenic archipelago. Diversity and Distributions, 24, 387– 402. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12689 Volume26, Issue8August 2020Pages 1053-1053 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Highlights

Amazonian forests have been extensively converted to cattle pastures and cropland inducing widespread loss and fragmentation of formerly continuous forests, especially in the eastern and southern portions of the basin (Laurance et al, 2001; Peres et al, 2010)
The rate of species loss as a function of island area reduction was higher for forest specialists than for habitat generalists
We examined whether forest fragmentation per se either exacerbates or reduces species loss as a function of forest loss, following Yaacobi et al

Summary

Introduction

Amazonian forests have been extensively converted to cattle pastures and cropland inducing widespread loss and fragmentation of formerly continuous forests, especially in the eastern and southern portions of the basin (Laurance et al, 2001; Peres et al, 2010). This scenario is further exacerbated by a massive growth in hydroelectric dams, which invariably inundate large tracts of forest, creating archipelagic landscapes (Lees et al, 2016). The detrimental consequences of forest fragmentation are amplified by a water matrix (Mendenhall et al, 2014), rendering hydroelectric dams a more severe threat to forest biotas

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion