Abstract

The objective of this study was to relate earthworm assemblage structure with three different soil use intensities, and to indentify the physical, chemical, and microbiological soil variables that are associated to the observed differences. Three soil uses were evaluated: 1-Fifty year old naturalized grasslands, low use intensity; 2-Recent agricultural fields, intermediate use intensity, and 3-Fifty year old intensive agricultural fields, high use intensity. Three different sites for each soil use were evaluated from winter 2008 through summer 2011. Nine earthworm species were identified across all sampling sites. The sites shared five species: the native Microscolex dubius, and the introduced Aporrectodea caliginosa, A. rosea, Octalasion cyaneum, and O. lacteum, but they differed in relative abundance by soil use. The results show that the earthworm community structure is linked to and modulated by soil properties. Both species abundance and diversity showed significant differences depending on soil use intensity. A principal component analysis showed that species composition is closely related to the environmental variability. The ratio of native to exotic species was significantly lower in the intensive agricultural system when compared to the other two, lower disturbance systems. Microscolex dubius abundance was related to naturalized grasslands along with soil Ca, pH, mechanical resistance, and microbial respiration. Aporrectodea caliginosa abundance was related to high K levels, low enzymatic activity, slightly low pH, low Ca, and appeared related to the highly disturbed environment. Eukerria stagnalis and Aporrectodea rosea, commonly found in the recent agricultural system, were related to high soil moisture condition, low pH, low Ca and low enzymatic activity. These results show that earthworm assemblages can be good indicators of soil use intensities. In particular, Microscolex dubius, Aporrectodea caliginosa, and Aporrectodea rosea, showed different temporal patterns and species associations, due to the changes in soil properties attributable to soil use intensity, defined as the amount and type of agricultural operations.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe organisms living in the soil, collectively known as soil biota, play a crucial role in regulating processes like water infiltration and storage, decomposition and nutrient cycling, humus formation, nutrient transformation and transport; they stimulate the symbiotic activity in the soil, improve the organic matter storage, and prevent erosion (Coleman & Crossley, 1996; Lavelle et al, 2006).Several of the ecosystem services provided by soil depend on the community of soil invertebrates (Lavelle et al, 2006), and earthworms are one of the most common components of edaphic communities

  • Microbiological activity and soil microfauna were assessed through soil respiration and nitrogen fixing bacteria activity, which separated the naturalized grasslands for their high value when compared to the other two agroecosystems

  • The data from this study indicate that the three agricultural systems are different in terms of the levels of exchangeable cations (Ca, K), pH, microbiological activity, and physical variables such as mechanical resistance and moisture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The organisms living in the soil, collectively known as soil biota, play a crucial role in regulating processes like water infiltration and storage, decomposition and nutrient cycling, humus formation, nutrient transformation and transport; they stimulate the symbiotic activity in the soil, improve the organic matter storage, and prevent erosion (Coleman & Crossley, 1996; Lavelle et al, 2006).Several of the ecosystem services provided by soil depend on the community of soil invertebrates (Lavelle et al, 2006), and earthworms are one of the most common components of edaphic communities. Due to the strong relation between earthworms and soils (Paoletti, 1998), modern agricultural practices can modify the physical and chemical soil environment modulating changes in abundance and composition of earthworm communities (Curry, Byrne & Schmidt, 2002). In this regard, Dale & Polasky (2007) indicate that in agricultural systems, changes in land cover are the direct result of management practices. When changes occur in agricultural practices, earthworm assemblages are able to respond to the ensuing changes in the soil’s physical properties and environmental conditions (Lavelle et al, 1997; Johnson-Maynard, Umiker & Guy, 2007)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call