Abstract

To explore trends in idiosyncratic income volatility, this paper employs a multifactor residual model to extract macroeconomic factors from individual changes in wages and total family income. The data used in this analysis is a subset of the persistently employed from the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics (PSID). Using this subset expands the income volatility literature by bridging an existing gap between studies using the PSID and others using a continuous work history sample. Improved aggregate economic conditions can explain much of the reduction in unconditional income volatility that took place during the Great Moderation, lasting from the mid-1980s into the 2000s. However, macro factors appear to be making larger contributions to individual and household income volatility following the recent rise in GDP volatility. In contrast, idiosyncratic volatility of income, that which remains after accounting for macroeconomic factors, has generally remained consistent. The stability of idiosyncratic income volatility suggests employment changes in the recent crisis were cyclical rather than structural.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.