Abstract

ABSTRACTDetection of bacterial DNA within meconium is often cited as evidence supporting in utero colonization. However, many studies fail to adequately control for contamination. We aimed to define the microbial content of meconium under properly controlled conditions. DNA was extracted from 141 meconium samples and subjected to cpn60-based microbiome profiling, with controls to assess contamination throughout. Total bacterial loads of neonatal meconium, infant stool, and controls were compared by 16S rRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR). Viable bacteria within meconium were cultured, and isolate clonality was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Meconium samples did not differ significantly from controls with respect to read numbers or taxonomic composition. Twenty (14%) outliers with markedly higher read numbers were collected significantly later after birth and appeared more like transitional stool than meconium. Total bacterial loads were significantly higher in stool than in meconium, which did not differ from that of sequencing controls, and correlated well with read numbers. Cultured isolates were most frequently identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, or Escherichia coli, with PFGE indicating high intraspecies diversity. Our findings highlight the importance of robust controls in studies of low microbial biomass samples and argue against meaningful bacterial colonization in utero. Given that meconium microbiome profiles could not be distinguished from sequencing controls, and that viable bacteria within meconium appeared uncommon and largely consistent with postnatal skin colonization, there does not appear to be a meconium microbiota.IMPORTANCE Much like the recent placental microbiome controversy, studies of neonatal meconium reporting bacterial communities within the fetal and neonatal gut imply that microbial colonization begins prior to birth. However, recent work has shown that placental microbiomes almost exclusively represent contamination from lab reagents and the environment. Here, we demonstrate that prior studies of neonatal meconium are impacted by the same issue, showing that the microbial content of meconium does not differ from negative controls that have never contained any biological material. Our culture findings similarly supported this notion and largely comprised bacteria normally associated with healthy skin. Overall, our work adds to the growing body of evidence against the in utero colonization hypothesis.

Highlights

  • Meconiumstained amniotic fluid was observed in 22/141 infants (14.2%) during labor and delivery

  • We highlighted the difficulty in identifying a distinct meconium microbiome against a background of widespread, exogenous DNA contamination

  • Our sequencing data do not support the existence of a bona fide microbiome within meconium and, while we were able to isolate low levels of bacteria from some samples, these more likely represent contamination from skin or diapers than in utero colonization [34]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tim J. Dumonceaux,g Evelyn J. Maan,b Janet E. Hill,a Deborah M. Money,b,d The Maternal Microbiome Legacy Project Team Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada a Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada d School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada f

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call