Early integration of palliative care versus standard cardiac care for patients with heart failure (EPCHF): a multicentre, parallel, two-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Heart failure is a substantial global health concern that severely affects patients' quality of life. We aimed to compare the effects of early integration of palliative care (EIPC) and standard cardiac care on health status and mood of patients with non-terminal heart failure. EPCHF was a multicentre, parallel, two-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial carried out at University Hospital Bonn and University Hospital Düsseldorf in Germany. Eligible patients (aged 18years or older) had heart failure, with New York Heart Association class IIor more and NT-proBNP concentrations greater than or equal to 400pg/mL. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive EIPC with standard cardiac care or standard cardiac care alone. Randomisation was computer-generated with allocation concealment, variable block sizes, and stratification by investigational site. The primary endpoints were health status and mood, measured every 3months over 12months using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-PAL) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with DRKS.de, DRKS00013922. Between May 21, 2019, and Nov 15, 2021, 843patients were assessed for eligibility, 205of whom were enrolled (100 assigned to EIPC and 105assigned to standard cardiac care). 143 (70%) patients were male and 62 (30%) were female. Over 12months, both groups significantly improved in FACIT-PAL and KCCQ Overall Summary Score(OSS) with no significant differences between the groups (FACIT-PAL adjusted mean difference 0·98points [95% CI -1·28to 3·23]; p=0·40; KCCQ-OSS adjusted mean difference -2·06points [-7·89to 3·78]; p=0·49). Nine (9%) patients in the EIPC group and seven (7%) patients in the standard cardiac care group died from any cause, with no significant differences in time to death between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1·32 [95% CI 0·49 to 3·54]; p=0·58). 22 (22%) patients in the EIPC group and 21 (21%) patients in the standard cardiac care group were hospitalised at least once due to heart failure, with no significant differences in time to heart-failure-related hospitalisation between the two groups (HR 1·09 [0·61 to 1·98]; p=0·77). 70 (70%) patients in the EIPC group and 62 (59%) in the standard cardiac care group had any adverse events (p=0·10). In this open-label, randomised clinical trial, standard cardiac care, featuring guideline-directed optimisation of medical therapy and regular 3-monthly follow-ups was found to be as effective as when combined with EIPC in improving health status and mood in patients with non-terminal heart failure. Future clinical practices should consider EIPC based on individual patient needs. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.