Abstract
Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) can improve outcomes for patients with severe forms of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but the evidence is mainly derived from non-thrombolyzed patients. We aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of early DHC in thrombolyzed AIS participants of the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED). Post-hoc analyses of ENCHANTED, an international, partial-factorial, open, blinded outcome-assessed, controlled trial in 4557 thrombolysis-eligible AIS patients randomized to low- versus standard-dose intravenous alteplase (Arm A, n = 2350), intensive versus guideline-recommended blood pressure control (Arm B, n = 1280), or both (Arms A + B, n = 947). Logistic regression models were used to identify baseline variables associated with DHC, with inverse probability of treatment weights employed to eliminate baseline imbalances between those with and without DHC. Logistic regression was also used to determine associations of DHC and clinical outcomes of death/disability, major disability, and death (defined by scores 2–6, 3–5, and 6, respectively, on the modified Rankin scale) at 90 days post-randomization. There were 95 (2.1%) thrombolyzed AIS patients who underwent DHC, who were significantly younger, of non-Asian ethnicity, and more likely to have had prior lipid-lowering treatment and severe neurological impairment from large vessel occlusion than other patients. DHC patients were more likely to receive other management interventions and have poor functional outcomes than non-DHC patients, with no relation to different doses of intravenous alteplase. Compared to other thrombolyzed AIS patients, those who received DHC had a poor prognosis from more severe disease despite intensive in-hospital management.
Highlights
Stroke is a leading cause of premature loss of productive life, estimated to have caused several million deaths worldwide in 2017, half due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS)[1]
The aim of this study was to characterize the use of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) and its relation to clinical outcomes in thrombolyzed AIS patients who participated in the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)
The low frequency (2.1%) of DHC in our study likely reflects the selection of thrombolyzed AIS patients for a clinical trial, but the true rate may be even lower following the introduction of endovascular clot retrieval (EVT) in routine clinical practice
Summary
Stroke is a leading cause of premature loss of productive life, estimated to have caused several million deaths worldwide in 2017, half due to acute ischemic stroke (AIS)[1]. Thrombolysis has more limited utility in AIS due to large vessel occlusion, EVT is not widely available, and the benefits of both are offset by increased risks of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)[3,4,5]. In patients with malignant hemispheric AIS, those presenting late or unable to access mechanical thrombectomy, decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) has been shown to improve outcomes from reducing intracranial pressure and preventing brain herniation[6]. The evidence for the benefits of DHC has mainly been derived from trials of young to middle-aged non-thrombolyzed adults with cerebral edema and mass effect from hemispheric AIS7–11, and there is limited data on outcomes from early DHC after intravenous thrombolysis in a broader range of patients where the risk of ICH from the treatment and surgery are high. The aim of this study was to characterize the use of DHC and its relation to clinical outcomes in thrombolyzed AIS patients who participated in the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have