Abstract

The ease of synchronizing movements to a rhythmic cue is dependent on the modality of the cue presentation: timing accuracy is much higher when synchronizing with discrete auditory rhythms than an equivalent visual stimulus presented through flashes. However, timing accuracy is improved if the visual cue presents spatial as well as temporal information (e.g., a dot following an oscillatory trajectory). Similarly, when synchronizing with an auditory target metronome in the presence of a second visual distracting metronome, the distraction is stronger when the visual cue contains spatial-temporal information rather than temporal only. The present study investigates individuals’ ability to synchronize movements to a temporal-spatial visual cue in the presence of same-modality temporal-spatial distractors. Moreover, we investigated how increasing the number of distractor stimuli impacted on maintaining synchrony with the target cue. Participants made oscillatory vertical arm movements in time with a vertically oscillating white target dot centered on a large projection screen. The target dot was surrounded by 2, 8, or 14 distractor dots, which had an identical trajectory to the target but at a phase lead or lag of 0, 100, or 200 ms. We found participants’ timing performance was only affected in the phase-lead conditions and when there were large numbers of distractors present (8 and 14). This asymmetry suggests participants still rely on salient events in the stimulus trajectory to synchronize movements. Subsequently, distractions occurring in the window of attention surrounding those events have the maximum impact on timing performance.

Highlights

  • Nodding or tapping along to a favorite song is often something we do with little conscious thought

  • These findings show that there is an asymmetrical effect of phaseoffset where the negative phase-offset conditions make the mean asynchrony more negative, so arm movements were drawn to the phase-leading distractor trajectories

  • We investigated how we synchronize our movements in time with a visually oscillating target cue in the presence of same-modality distractor cues

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nodding or tapping along to a favorite song is often something we do with little conscious thought. Groups of individuals can spontaneously coordinate the timing of their movements, for example, two people falling into step when walking together (Zivotofsky et al, 2012), or an excited crowd bouncing up and down together in a sports stadium (Noormohammadi et al, 2011). In these group scenarios, visual cues are likely to Visual cue synchronization with distractors provide a strong timing stimulus that results in implicit synchrony emerging within the group. We have developed an experimental paradigm that investigates how individuals synchronize movements to a target visual cue in the presence of conflicting visual stimuli

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call