Abstract
ABSTRACT Ratings and labels that warn audiences of sensitive content in media are largely in existence due to concern about potential media impact on young audiences. Largely absent from the research to date, however, are the voices of young people themselves on whether they find media ratings practices to be fair, accurate, and effective. Like many features of the media landscape, the current ratings systems may be taken for granted in the absence of media literacy education that specifically calls for their analysis and critique. In this qualitative study, 58 early adolescents provide open-ended responses to a number of questions designed to measure their views about media ratings and labels used in the U.S. within the context of an in-school media literacy program. Responses show that students learned from the media literacy discussions, applying concepts introduced, using logical reasoning to support their views, and expressing varying levels of critique of current ratings systems. Implications for the ability of early adolescents to use ratings to regulate their own media use are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have